Punishment by detail by Edward Said 2:18pm Mon Aug 12 '02 Terrorism, and its obsessive pursuit, have become an entirely circular, self-fulfiling murder and slow death of enemies who have no choice or say in the matter. print article Aside from the obvious physical discomforts, being ill for a long period of time fills the spirit with a terrible feeling of helplessness, but also with periods of analytic lucidity, which, of course, must be treasured. For the past three months now I have been in and out of the hospital, with days marked by lengthy and painful treatments, blood transfusions, endless tests, hours and hours of unproductive time spent staring at the ceiling, draining fatigue and infection, inability to do normal work, and thinking, thinking, thinking. But there are also the intermittent passages of lucidity and reflection that sometimes give the mind a perspective on daily life that allows it to see things (without being able to do much about them) from a different perspective. Reading the news from Palestine and seeing the frightful images of death and destruction on television, it has been my experience to be utterly amazed and aghast at what I have deduced from those details about Israeli government policy, more particularly about what has been going on in the mind of Ariel Sharon. And when, after the recent Gaza bombing by one of his F-16s in which nine children were massacred, he was quoted as congratulating the pilot and boasting of a great Israeli success, I was able to form a much clearer idea than before of what a pathologically deranged mind is capable of, not only in terms of what it plans and orders but, worse, how it manages to persuade other minds to think in the same delusional and criminal way. Getting inside the official Israeli mind is a worthwhile, if lurid, experience. In the West, however, there's been such repetitious and unedifying attention paid to Palestinian suicide bombing that a gross distortion in reality has completely obscured what is much worse: the official Israeli, and perhaps the uniquely Sharonian evil that has been visited so deliberately and so methodically on the Palestinian people. Suicide bombing is reprehensible but it is a direct and, in my opinion, a consciously programmed result of years of abuse, powerlessness and despair. It has as little to do with the Arab or Muslim supposed propensity for violence as the man in the moon. Sharon wants terrorism, not peace, and he does everything in his power to create the conditions for it. But for all its horror, Palestinian violence, the response of a desperate and horribly oppressed people, has been stripped of its context and the terrible suffering from which it arises: a failure to see that is a failure in humanity, which doesn't make it any less terrible but at least situates it in a real history and real geography. Yet the location of Palestinian terror -- of course it is terror -- is never allowed a moment's chance to appear, so remorseless has been the focus on it as a phenomenon apart, a pure, gratuitous evil which Israel, supposedly acting on behalf of pure good, has been virtuously battling in its variously appalling acts of disproportionate violence against a population of three million Palestinian civilians. I am not speaking only about Israel's manipulation of opinion, but its exploitation of the American equivalent of the campaign against terrorism without which Israel could not have done what it has done. (In fact, I cannot think of any other country on earth that, in full view of nightly TV audiences, has performed such miracles of detailed sadism against an entire society and gotten away with it.) That this evil has been made consciously part of George W Bush's campaign against terrorism, irrationally magnifying American fantasies and fixations with extraordinary ease, is no small part of its blind destructiveness. Like the brigades of eager (and in my opinion completely corrupt) American intellectuals who spin enormous structures of falsehoods about the benign purpose and necessity of US imperialism, Israeli society has pressed into service numerous academics, policy intellectuals at think tanks, and ex-military men now in defence- related and public relations business, all to rationalise and make convincing inhuman punitive policies that are supposedly based on the need for Israeli security. Israeli security is now a fabled beast. Like a unicorn it is endlessly hunted and never found, remaining, everlastingly, the goal of future action. That over time Israel has become less secure and more unacceptable to its neighbours scarcely merits a moment's notice. But then who challenges the view that Israeli security ought to define the moral world we live in? Certainly not the Arab and Palestinian leaderships who for 30 years have conceded everything to Israeli security. Shouldn't that ever be questioned, given that Israel has wreaked more damage on the Palestinians and other Arabs relative to its size than any country in the world, Israel with its nuclear arsenal, its air force, navy, and army limitlessly supplied by the US taxpayer? As a result the daily, minute occurrences of what Palestinians have to live through are hidden and, more important, covered over by a logic of self-defence and the pursuit of terrorism (terrorist infrastructure, terrorist nests, terrorist bomb factories, terrorist suspects -- the list is infinite) which perfectly suits Sharon and the lamentable George Bush. Ideas about terrorism have thus taken on a life of their own, legitimised and re- legitimised without proof, logic or rational argument. Consider for instance the devastation of Afghanistan, on the one hand, and the "targeted" assassinations of almost 100 Palestinians (to say nothing of many thousands of "suspects" rounded- up and still imprisoned by Israeli soldiers) on the other: nobody asks whether all these people killed were in fact terrorists, or proved to be terrorists, or were about to become terrorists. They are all assumed to be dangers by acts of simple, unchallenged affirmation. All you need is an arrogant spokesman or two, like the loutish Ranaan Gissin, Avi Pazner, or Dore Gold, and in Washington a non-stop apologist for ignorance and incoherence like Ari Fleisher, and the targets in question are just as good as dead. Without doubts, questions, or demurral. No need for proof or any such tiresome delicacy. Terrorism and its obsessive pursuit have become an entirely circular, self-fulfilling murder and slow death of enemies who have no choice or say in the matter. With the exception of reports by a few intrepid journalists and writers such as Amira Hass, Gideon Levy, Amos Elon, Tanya Leibowitz, Jeff Halper, Israel Shamir and a few others, public discourse in the Israeli media has declined terribly in quality and honesty. Patriotism and blind support for the government has replaced skeptical reflection and moral seriousness. Gone are the days of Israel Shahak, Jakob Talmon, and Yehoshua Leibowitch. I can think of few Israeli academics and intellectuals -- men like Zeev Sternhell, Uri Avneri, and Ilan Pappe, for instance -- who are courageous enough to depart from the imbecilic and debased debate about "security" and "terrorism" that seems to have overtaken the Israeli peace establishment, or even its rapidly dwindling Left opposition. Crimes are being committed every day in the name of Israel and the Jewish people, and yet the intellectuals chatter on about strategic withdrawal, or perhaps whether to incorporate settlements or not, or whether to keep building that monstrous fence (has a crazier idea ever been realised in the modern world, that you can put several million people in a cage and say they don't exist?) in a manner befitting a general or a politician, rather than in ways more suited to intellectuals and artists with independent judgment and some sort of moral standard. Where are the Israeli equivalents of Nadine Gordimer, Andre Brink, Athol Fugard, those white writers who spoke out unequivocally and with unambiguous clarity against the evils of South African apartheid? They simply don't exist in Israel, where public discourse by writers and academics has sunk to equivocation and the repetition of official propaganda, and where most really first-class writing and thought has disappeared from even the academic establishment. But to return to Israeli practices and the mind-set that has gripped the country with such obduracy during the past few years, think of Sharon's plan. It entails nothing less than the obliteration of an entire people by slow, systematic methods of suffocation, outright murder, and the stifling of everyday life. There is a remarkable story by Kafka, In the Penal Colony, about a crazed official who shows off a fantastically detailed torture machine whose purpose is to write all over the body of the victim, using a complex apparatus of needles to inscribe the captive's body with minute letters that ultimately causes the prisoner to bleed to death. This is what Sharon and his brigades of willing executioners are doing to the Palestinians, with only the most limited and most symbolic of opposition. Every Palestinian has become a prisoner. Gaza is surrounded by an electrified wire fence on three sides; imprisoned like animals, Gazans are unable to move, unable to work, unable to sell their vegetables or fruit, unable to go to school. They are exposed from the air to Israeli planes and helicopters and are gunned down like turkeys on the ground by tanks and machine guns. Impoverished and starved, Gaza is a human nightmare, each of whose little pieces of episodes -- like what takes place at Erez, or near the settlements -- involves thousands of soldiers in the humiliation, punishment, intolerable enfeeblement of each Palestinian, without regard for age, gender, or illness. Medical supplies are held up at the border, ambulances are fired upon or detained. Hundreds of houses demolished, and hundreds of thousands of trees and agricultural land destroyed in acts of systematic collective punishment against civilians, most of whom are already refugees from Israel's destruction of their society in 1948. Hope has been eliminated from the Palestinian vocabulary so that only raw defiance remains, and still Sharon and his sadistic minions prattle on about eliminating terrorism by an ever-encroaching occupation that has continued now for 35 years. That the campaign itself is, like all colonial brutality, futile, or that it has the effect of making Palestinians more, rather than less, defiant simply does not enter Sharon's closed mind. The West Bank is occupied by 1,000 Israeli tanks whose sole purpose is to fire upon and terrorise civilians. Curfews are imposed for periods of up to two weeks, without respite. Schools and universities are either closed or impossible to get to. No one can travel, not just between the nine main cities, but within the cities. Every town today is a wasteland of destroyed buildings, looted offices, purposely ruined water and electrical systems. Commerce is finished. Malnutrition prevails in half the number of children. Two thirds of the population lives below the poverty level of $2 a day. Tanks in Jenin (where the demolition of the refugee camp by Israeli armour, a major war crime, was never investigated because cowardly international bureaucrats such as Kofi Annan back down when Israel threatens) fire upon and kill children, but that is only one drop in an unending stream of Palestinian civilian deaths caused by Israeli soldiers who furnish the illegal Israeli military occupation with loyal, unquestioning service. Palestinians are all "terrorist suspects". The soul of this occupation is that young Israeli conscripts are allowed full rein to subject Palestinians at check-points to every known form of private torture and abjection. There is the waiting in the sun for hours; then there is the detention of medical supplies and produce until they rot; there are the insulting words and beatings administered at will; the sudden rampage of jeeps and soldiers against civilians waiting their turn by the thousands at the innumerable check points that have made of Palestinian life a choking hell; making dozens of youths kneel in the sun for hours; forcing men to take off their clothes; insulting and humiliating parents in front of their children; forbidding the sick to pass through for no other reason than personal whim; stopping ambulances and firing on them. And the steady number of Palestinian deaths (quadruple that of Israelis) increases on a daily, mostly untabulated basis. More "terrorist suspects" plus their wives and children, but "we" regret those deaths very much. Thank you. Israel is frequently referred to as a democracy. If so, then it is a democracy without a conscience, a country whose soul has been captured by a mania for punishing the weak, a democracy that faithfully mirrors the psychopathic mentality of its ruler, General Sharon, whose sole idea -- if that is the right word for it -- is to kill, reduce, maim, drive away Palestinians until "they break". He provides nothing more concrete as a goal for his campaigns, now or in the past, beyond that, and like the garrulous official in Kafka's story he is most proud of his machine for abusing defenceless Palestinian civilians, all the while monstrously abetted in his grotesque lies by his court advisers and philosophers and generals, as well as by his chorus of faithful American servants. There is no Palestinian army of occupation, no Palestinian tanks, no soldiers, no helicopter gun-ships, no artillery, no government to speak of. But there are the "terrorists" and the "violence" that Israel has invented so that its own neuroses can be inscribed on the bodies of Palestinians, without effective protest from the overwhelming majority of Israel's laggard philosophers, intellectuals, artists, peace activists. Palestinian schools, libraries and universities have ceased normal functioning for months now: and we still wait for the Western freedom-to-write-groups and the vociferous defenders of academic freedom in America to raise their voices in protest. I have yet to see one academic organisation either in Israel or in the West make a declaration about this profound abrogation of the Palestinian right to knowledge, to learning, to attend school. In sum, Palestinians must die a slow death so that Israel can have its security, which is just around the corner but cannot be realised because of the special Israeli "insecurity". The whole world must sympathise, while the cries of Palestinian orphans, sick old women, bereaved communities, and tortured prisoners simply go unheard and unrecorded. Doubtless, we will be told, these horrors serve a larger purpose than mere sadistic cruelty. After all, "the two sides" are engaged in a "cycle of violence" which has to be stopped, sometime, somewhere. Once in a while, we ought to pause and declare indignantly that there is only side with an army and a country: the other is a stateless dispossessed population of people without rights or any present way of securing them. The language of suffering and concrete daily life has either been hijacked, or it has been so perverted as, in my opinion, to be useless except as pure fiction deployed as a screen for the purpose of more killing and painstaking torture -- slowly, fastidiously, inexorably. That is the truth of what Palestinians suffer. But in any case, Israeli policy will ultimately fail. www.ahram.org.eg/weekly add your comments Source file

A Letter to Israiljews media stratigsts by Hamid Tomasa Ahmed Thomas 5:19pm Mon Aug 12 '02 print comment For decades the Israelis have thier Arab radio to speak to Arab masses.Israeli officials vioces have been heared.You see them in such Aljazira and the Egyptian TV sattelite seen by the Arabs.On a dialy basis Israeli articles are being transfered.In Alquds alarabi of London for example, there is a daily entire page of such translations.Now the Israelis have a an Arab TV.The Israelis must know that Arabs are already overloaded with the music of discotic,arabic and anglosexon.You waste money by adding extra.Consider Adil Hamooda article on Jews sucking blood of Christians.Hamooda who is in his late fifties or sixties is partialy a product of the failure of Israeli propaganda of the 60,s,70,s and now.Jews never talk about commonalities and try try to penterate the hearts and minds of elites like Hammoda.Speak about Jewish religious celebration,customs,events and be close to Arab context.Just show the human side.For example,Adil Hammoda is excused of Anti-judisemetism,with no explantion on the Israeli media stregy why this is true.Your silence keep giving Arabs the impression that you are only intersted in censor.Go to the history of this blood libel incident and show that only racists and hateres of Judism have used it,somethinh Hammooda does not know.Hammoda talked about the disapearance of Italian monk and his servent.This is old europeam accusation that caused many sufferings to jews and it is even in America believed and it is time for those who claim to defend the Jews LIKE ALEN KEYES IS MAKING SENSE TO UPROOT THIS REMIANS OF ANTISEMETISM IF THEY ARE TRULY FRUIENDS OF JEWS AS THEY CLAIM 24 dollars.Go to these O israeli propaganda details which Hammoda is ignorantt about.The French report of this incident has been treated by Hammoda as a Bible when a writer like him must look inside and outside the report,and the factors that shaped it looking like a scholor and a judge and considering the Ottoman court system desribed by Arabs as injust and the week and Turkish rulers hoping to please French officials,etc.Does Hammoda know that the French boy who wrote the report knew no Arabic and many more critiques which the Israeli media does not care to raise.WHYwhy whywhy why?.But Hammoda was just looking for such reports and it is easy to find many to spread such yellow jpurnalism.Because Israeli propaganda has been a total failure some Arabs would believe such a story that Rabbis and wisemen under ritualsof Judisn would such blood of christians.The European press full of antisemetism at that time recieved this Damascusian incident even worse the way Hammoda did.Look at how Hammoda in what unintellectual age(1840) he lives in and what he is exporting to Arabs?IHammoda as a leading writer in Alahram failed to bring any defense of the other that is how Jewish writers in the past years responded to this Damascus court in 1840.This is basic.But unfortuantly there is a total Israeli media which failed to educate Hammoda.There is no doubt that Hammoda is angry at what is happening to Palistinians and he translate his hate to accusing the Jews of blood ritual something the Romans who hated christians before embracing christianity did.But Hammod to demonstare his love of Palistinians can do things that benefit them rathewr than harm them and Arabs and also his newspaper alahram and his chief editor whom was accused of antisemetrism by the french.It is the french who created this legend in the middle east in the first place and it is they who failed to take it away and this deserves another article. add your comments

A Macvalian Islamist in defense of Adil Hammo by Define your self 5:30pm Tue Aug 13 '02 print comment The Egyptain Islamist thinker Fahmi Hawady in Alahram today offers a defense of "our collegue Adil Hammoda".He starts his aricle by arguing that those who work and move and commit tricks(Yahtaloon) to achieve thier goals and serve thier intersets should not be blamed.Yahtaloon,used by the Islamist has negative connotation in Arabic.Almuhtal,the noun is Nassab,thief,lies,decieve,etc.Whose intersts and whose goals this "islamist"is talking about and what is the criteria and standards and what are these goals and intersts and what are exactly these tricks this Islamist is calling for learing them from the Israelis as he argues?To partialy show some of his Macavilian style he claims that the incident of Damascus appeared in Damascus two centuries ago.He does not even say around two centuries and his purpose is to conceal the date (1840) or he is two ignorant of the story and thus unqualified to write about it.I hypotheze that he wants to conceal 1840,the year the Monk Tomasa and his servent disappeared.The purpose of negleting the date is makes it sound as out of context of colonialism.The Islamist Egyptain Mr Hawady seems to believes the story is true because it is Maroofa,famous and is found in Arab and forihgn sources.The avialability of many secondary sources can be just bias and one has to go to the primary source the Court records or more accuratley the policing investigation and keep in mind the European desire to force the Turks to open the closed Jewish community of Damascus and this incident was a key factor.In addition the court records are not evidence in them selves.The Islamist thinker must analyze and investigate the events that may have led tothis record and then give his professional view educting the reader .But he just wants to publish articles daily without working and moving as he advice above.Thus even the French official who could not read in Arabic the court record is not a primary source.Thus articles in the French and British which relied on him are not evidence that the story is true.But the problem that Faces The thinker is that the Library Catalog of Egyptian universities with my respect is backward and defect and corrupt.You can never under such a library system conduct any research.Muslims and Christian and Jews lived centuries together and this story of ritual blood sucking of Christians by Jews were nor reported and this what Fahmi neglect to deal with.This is not to suggest that harmony and total peasce existed among Jews and Muslamans.No for even within Muslims like Druz,Sunni,Shiites serious disharmony existed.But it is when European anti- semetism was introduced to Arabs that the relations between Muslims and Jews atarted to seriously collapse and unfourtantly The Egyptian Islamist thinker rather than acting within the spirit of the Egyptian Israeli Peace treaty to facilitate broader peace is diong the opposite and above that distorting Islam and making Islamic thought Macavili. add your comments

An Egyptian Professor of Hebrew studies antis by Should we respect Jewish struggle?Yes 5:32pm Thu Aug 15 '02 print comment Adil Hammoda recieved another letter of support in Alahram today by a professor of Hebrew Studies at the University of Ain Shams,professor Layla Abu-Almagd.The defense of Adil Hammoda is in addition to be defense of anti-semetism is a defense of yellow journalism.Unlike the demogogic writers Hammoda and Mustafa Mahmood Layla pretends to speak as a scholor.The professor claims that the term antisemetism was invented by Jews to claim racial purity.This is false since the invention of this term is most likely a product of European racism,Jerman in the 19th century in particular.To give hate of the Jews another falvor a racist term dominte at that time was created to make the Jews as distinct.This may have served some elements in the Jewish communities.But this does not mean as the professor argue is purely a Jewish product.The Professor argues that Israel is inherently an aggressive and hostile nation because "Israel" as a name was chosen because it means one who wrestle with God and man and wins.Thus she argues that Jews want to perpetuate the idea of struggle and the eternal state of hostility so that the zionist leaders can control the masses.I will respond to her but I admit that Jews are more qualified to do so.But they(thier leaders who respond to such claims) unfortuantly act always like victims rather than educators.As Muslims we do not believe that Israel means one who wrestle with God and people and win.Israel or Jacob is a prophet.The professor claims that this meaning of Israel is in the old Testement(the Christain name of the Torah).However,this is only her interpretation and there is no explicit mentioning that Israel means so.If this professor's students who are the future scholors of Hebrew and Jewish studies accept her views then they will act with hostility to Jews and this will force the Jews to act as if they are realy in struggle for survival.People who read a "professor of Hebrew studies at the Unversity of Ain Shams in her article will be fooled and may perpetute more bias toward the Jews at a time when one expect a university professor to act with academic integrity at the least.Egyptians made a peace treaty with Israel and they must take the lead in eliminating misudertanding rather than systemeticly diong the opposite for why there is a peace treaty in the first place.The Jews did live in struggle in thier history and as a specialist of Jewish studies she should enlighten her readers rather than saying European anti-semetism in the Middle ages was because of Jewish conspiracies and blackmailing and thier refuse to mix with non-jewis .If Europeans are apologizing under the facts,not Jewish world domination why should Muslims regress and borrow thier hate?.The Jews fought for thier right not to worship the Roman emperor,not to be conscripted,not to worship roman idols,to have thier religious celebrations respected,etc and they won to some extent.They did not act as slaves giving up thier rights and the world to some extent who today talk about rights of groups must not forget the Jewish struggle.Why a professor who knows a lot about Jewish heritage makes this struggle an execuse to hate Jews???It is her hate and disrespect of freedom,cheap yellow journalism and this article is probably from her college notes which also probably are for sale,since it is customary practice for Egyptian professors to sell thier notes due to budgetery diet.The Jews struggle to worship one God against pagan attempts to force them to worship many Gods is a struggle that belong to humanity.The Alexendarians,for example, told the Jews if you do not worship our idols then you are not equal or you must just leave.The Jews struggled and again this struggle is to be respected.The professor has the right to argue that this struggle was not totaly for noble reasons provided .But she has no right to deny any noble motivation for this is antisemetism.Antisemetism is widely used and more important is what is associated and context .For example,many Arabs think "IRHAB"is the wrong translation of terrorism.Yet they use it.Many or most Jews aware that not all semites are jews as well as not all Jews are semites do prefere anti-judism to anti-semetism.The professor gives a long lecture that Arabs are semites(Arabs are mixed) and thus Adil Hammoda is not guilty of anti-semetism.Look to what base Adil Hammoda is graping academics.If Adil Hammoda's pen is dirty of antisemetism or anti-judism or whatever why follow a demogogic writer who realy speaks in the name of Middle ages anti-Judism and the remains of European antisemetism which being exported to us.The professor falls in the trap of treating Judism as anti-peace and evil and aggressive.This is unIslamic.Judism today is not the same as Judism yesterday,is not the same as Judism tommorrow.As Muslims we must act according to Islamic call for dailogue and contribute inderectly to a return of Judism to its origin,Judism of peace and coexistence.We should not be the instruemts for leading judism to our bias perceptions. add your comments