ניווטרשת אינדימדיה העולמית
|
transparencies in public organizationBy Tom, submitted by Anonymous on שני, 21/06/2004 - 07:10
גרסת להדפסהSend by emailPDF version
After medling with my city hall i had this new resolution: After medling with my city hall i had this new resolution: im going to try work it out where i live תגובות |
חדשות
חמישי 18 ספטמבר 2014
רביעי 17 ספטמבר 2014
שבת 13 ספטמבר 2014
שבת 30 אוגוסט 2014
ראשון 15 דצמבר 2013
שישי 13 דצמבר 2013
רביעי 11 דצמבר 2013
שלישי 10 דצמבר 2013
שני 9 דצמבר 2013
חמישי 5 דצמבר 2013
רביעי 4 דצמבר 2013
שלישי 3 דצמבר 2013
שני 2 דצמבר 2013
ראשון 1 דצמבר 2013
Other Pressחיפוש |
Nice idea, but a bit naive
Take for example the famous "path of the wall". There was a protest camp in Dier Balut a few months ago, in a construction site of a school.
They got from various Israeli authorities 3 different maps. In one of them, the school was outside the fence (typical), in another one it was inside the fence, but close enough to become a "security risk" that has to be demolished, in the third map, the 60-100m wide barrier went *over* the school (and it had to be demolished, of course).
All 3 maps came from some Israeli office(s). There were probably officials who saw all 3, but there's only one person who will decide according to his immediate needs where to build the next meter of the barrier, and his name is Ariel Sharon.
Transparency is a god idea, and we should continue to do whatever we can in order to research how to implement it (see http://www.law.co.il/shownews.html?d=h&abtd=1&news=1366), but in Israel of 2004, where Vanunu is not allowed to see what *he* said in his trial because that's too classified for *him*, transparency is a mere dream