NavigationGlobal IMC Network
|
transparencies in public organization
By Tom, submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 21/06/2004 - 07:10
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
After medling with my city hall i had this new resolution: After medling with my city hall i had this new resolution: im going to try work it out where i live Comments |
Newswire
Thu 18 September 2014
FOREIGN AFFAIRS AS OPERA BUFFA: THE GLOBAL FIGHT AGAINST ISIS
Wed 17 September 2014
sac alma louis vuitton 410 08
Sat 13 September 2014
Sat 30 August 2014
Sun 15 December 2013
Fri 13 December 2013
Wed 11 December 2013
Tue 10 December 2013
Mon 9 December 2013
Thu 5 December 2013
Wed 4 December 2013
Tue 3 December 2013
Mon 2 December 2013
Sun 1 December 2013
Other PressSearch |
Nice idea, but a bit naive
Take for example the famous "path of the wall". There was a protest camp in Dier Balut a few months ago, in a construction site of a school.
They got from various Israeli authorities 3 different maps. In one of them, the school was outside the fence (typical), in another one it was inside the fence, but close enough to become a "security risk" that has to be demolished, in the third map, the 60-100m wide barrier went *over* the school (and it had to be demolished, of course).
All 3 maps came from some Israeli office(s). There were probably officials who saw all 3, but there's only one person who will decide according to his immediate needs where to build the next meter of the barrier, and his name is Ariel Sharon.
Transparency is a god idea, and we should continue to do whatever we can in order to research how to implement it (see http://www.law.co.il/shownews.html?d=h&abtd=1&news=1366), but in Israel of 2004, where Vanunu is not allowed to see what *he* said in his trial because that's too classified for *him*, transparency is a mere dream